Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If compatibilism is coherent, an omnipotent being could causally determine the conditions from which a genuinely free choice flows without violating freedom.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If all conditions are causally determined by an omnipotent being, the agent lacks alternative possibilities—a requirement for genuine freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Compatibilism conflates absence of external coercion with real freedom; ultimate origination of choice seems necessary for desert and moral responsibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An agent whose thoughts, desires, and reasoning are fully determined by another's will cannot authentically own those mental states as their own.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Freedom requires only that choices flow from the agent's own desires and reasoning, not that they be uncaused or undetermined.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An omnipotent being could design an agent whose internal processes reliably produce choices the agent authentically endorses.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Causal determination of preconditions differs morally from coercion, which bypasses the agent's deliberative capacities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.