Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If consciousness concepts are themselves revisable or eliminable, as Churchland argues, the explanatory target may dissolve rather than remain permanently inaccessible.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Consciousness is directly self-evident through first-person experience in ways phlogiston never was, making elimination incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Revising consciousness concepts requires explaining why the revised concepts explain the same subjective phenomena the originals targeted.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Eliminativism about consciousness undermines the normative and ethical frameworks that depend on recognizing conscious subjects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Folk psychology successfully revised phlogiston and vitalism, showing conceptual frameworks can dissolve when empirically unsupported.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If neuroscience explains behavior without invoking subjective experience, consciousness concepts become explanatorily idle and eliminable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Conceptual dissolution solves the hard problem by eliminating the apparent explanatory gap rather than bridging an impossible chasm.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.