Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If consciousness is among the intrinsic grounds of the physical, then physical descriptions already implicitly quantify over phenomenal facts, dissolving the logical gap the argument presupposes.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Physical descriptions can be logically independent of phenomenal facts even if consciousness grounds them causally or metaphysically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Implicit quantification over phenomenal facts in physical language wouldn't dissolve the explanatory gap without explicit conceptual reduction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Grounding relations don't eliminate the distinction between how things are described and what ultimately grounds that description.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Physical descriptions that omit phenomenal properties are necessarily incomplete, making them tacitly dependent on consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If consciousness grounds physical facts, then any complete physical theory must implicitly reference the phenomenal base.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The hard problem assumes a logical gap only because standard physical descriptions artificially exclude their own phenomenal foundations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.