Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If constant conjunction were sufficient for genuine causa... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Constant conjunction is neither necessary nor sufficient for the presence of a genuine causal law.

    If constant conjunction were sufficient for genuine causal laws, every epiphenomenal correlation and every case of joint effects would constitute a law, which produces absurd proliferation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Causal laws(the general principles governing cause and effect)
    Rules of nature that describe how one thing causes another to happen—the predictable patterns we see in the world.
    Joint effects(as the phenomenon that needs to be distinguished in causal analysis)
    Multiple outcomes or results that are all caused by the same single cause.
    absurd proliferation(as used in philosophical arguments)
    An unreasonable explosion in the number of things we'd have to accept as true. Here it means we'd end up calling almost every correlation a 'law' when clearly not all patterns are real laws.
    constant conjunction(Central concept in Hume's account of causation)
    A relation between two types of events such that one has always been followed by the other throughout observed experience.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    epiphenomenal correlation(as used in philosophy of causation)
    When two things appear connected but neither actually causes the other—they're just both caused by something else. Like how a thermometer rising is correlated with temperature increasing, but the thermometer doesn't cause the heat.
    sufficient condition(Used in the context of whether intrinsic properties can define species membership)
    A property whose presence guarantees membership in or applicability of a category, such that having the property entails belonging to the species or class

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation1 linked

    Related

    Constant conjunction is neither necessary nor sufficient for the presence of a g...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective