If context change potentials are systematically definable from truth-conditional content, dynamic semantics reduces to an extension of static theory, not a reversal of its priorities.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Extension of static theory(as used in philosophy of language): A view that dynamic semantics is just adding extra features on top of traditional semantic theory, rather than completely replacing it with something fundamentally different.
Static theory(as used in philosophy of language): A traditional approach to language meaning that treats each sentence's meaning as fixed and complete on its own, independent of how it affects other statements or the conversation flow.
Truth-conditional content(in semantics and philosophy of language): The meaning of a sentence defined by the specific conditions under which that sentence would be true or false.
context change potentials(The central theoretical construct of dynamic semantics): The semantic values assigned to sentences under dynamic approaches; roughly, instructions for updating the context or discourse

Based on where you are in your exploration