Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If contingency is secured by the infinitude of the analys... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Leibniz could not have accepted sufficient reason as a finite a priori proof in his mature philosophy

    If contingency is secured by the infinitude of the analysis rather than by rejecting a priori grounding, necessitarianism does not follow from PSR.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Infinite analysis preserves explanatory closure without requiring every fact to be metaphysically necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.PSR demands sufficient reason, not that reasons terminate in necessities; infinite regress satisfies sufficiency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Contingency requires only that a fact could have been otherwise, compatible with infinite grounding chains.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Infinite analysis merely defers explanation indefinitely; it never actually grounds contingency in anything determinate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If PSR requires complete intelligibility, an infinite chain remains unintelligible as a whole—no explanation of why this chain exists.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Necessitarianism follows if only necessary beings can ground facts; infinite contingency chains lack ultimate grounding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedNatural Theology1 linked

    Related

    Contingency requires only that a fact could have been otherwise, compatible with...If PSR requires complete intelligibility, an infinite chain remains unintelligib...Infinite analysis merely defers explanation indefinitely; it never actually grou...Infinite analysis preserves explanatory closure without requiring every fact to ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Leibniz could not have accepted sufficient reason as a finite a priori proof in ...Necessitarianism follows if only necessary beings can ground facts; infinite con...PSR demands sufficient reason, not that reasons terminate in necessities; infini...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit