Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If contingent truths require infinite analysis to resolve... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Necessary truths and contingent truths can be distinguished while maintaining that all truths are analytic.

    If contingent truths require infinite analysis to resolve, they cannot be 'analytic' in any epistemically or logically meaningful sense, only in a stipulative one.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Analytic truths are knowable a priori without empirical investigation; infinite analysis requires empirical-like successive steps.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a truth's resolution depends on infinite regress, we can never actually complete the analysis, making knowledge impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Stipulative definitions are conventional; if analyticity is merely stipulated for infinite cases, it loses explanatory power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Mathematical truths require infinite steps (e.g., proof by induction) yet remain analytic; infinite analysis ≠ non-analytic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Analyticity concerns logical containment, not epistemic accessibility; a truth can be analytic even if unknowable in practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Leibniz's complete concept includes infinite predicates yet remains logically determinate; infinite content permits analytical status.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Analytic truths are knowable a priori without empirical investigation; infinite ...Analyticity concerns logical containment, not epistemic accessibility; a truth c...If a truth's resolution depends on infinite regress, we can never actually compl...Leibniz's complete concept includes infinite predicates yet remains logically de...
    +3 moreShow less
    Mathematical truths require infinite steps (e.g., proof by induction) yet remain...Necessary truths and contingent truths can be distinguished while maintaining th...Stipulative definitions are conventional; if analyticity is merely stipulated fo...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit