Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If DB entails that basic beliefs are justified by non-dox... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→DB alone is insufficient to fully account for the justification of basic beliefs

    If DB entails that basic beliefs are justified by non-doxastic states such as perceptual experience, as argued by dogmatists like James Pryor, then DB implicitly contains a positive justificatory story rather than leaving one absent.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    DB(Foundationalist epistemology)
    A definition of basicality that specifies how a basic belief is not justified — namely, not by inference from other beliefs — but does not specify what does justify it
    James Pryor(as a philosopher in epistemology)
    A contemporary American philosopher known for defending the view that perceptual experiences can directly justify beliefs about what you're seeing, without requiring other reasons or evidence.
    basic beliefs(Foundationalist epistemology)
    Beliefs that are justified by seemings or experiences rather than by other beliefs; they would not be basic if their justifying states were themselves beliefs
    dogmatists(ancient epistemology; the opponents of the Skeptics)
    Those who settle on their beliefs too quickly and do not persevere in their enquiries

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    entails(describes a logical relationship between statements)
    Logically forces or guarantees; if A entails B, then whenever A is true, B must also be true.
    justificatory story(as used in epistemology)
    An explanation of how and why beliefs count as justified—the account or theory that explains what makes a belief reasonable to hold.
    justified(Epistemological discussion of Socratic wisdom in The Apology)
    Having beliefs formed with adequate evidence or through reliable belief-forming processes, distinct from the ability to demonstrate one's justification to an interrogator.
    non-doxastic states(as used in epistemology)
    Mental experiences that aren't beliefs themselves, like the raw sensation of seeing red or feeling pain—the experience comes before you form a belief about it.
    perceptual experience(as used in epistemology)
    The direct sensory experiences you have when you see, hear, touch, taste, or smell something—what the world seems like to you right now.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    DB alone is insufficient to fully account for the justification of basic beliefs

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective