Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If deprivation before birth does not harm the non-existent person, there is no principled asymmetry that makes deprivation after death harmful to the deceased.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The deceased once existed and had interests; pre-birth non-entities never had interests to be thwarted. This grounds an asymmetry in what counts as deprivation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Post-death harm can violate a person's wishes and projects formed during life; pre-birth deprivation cannot frustrate any actual preferences or plans.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Our duties to honor the dead rest on respecting persons-as-they-were; we have no such duties to potential people who never actualize into persons with stakes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Harm requires a subject who experiences deprivation. Non-existent people cannot experience anything, so pre-birth deprivation cannot harm them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If we accept that non-existence before birth causes no harm, denying a consistent principle to post-death deprivation appears ad hoc and arbitrary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Both pre-birth and post-death deprivation involve absence from existence. The timing difference alone doesn't establish metaphysically distinct harm mechanisms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.