Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If determinate incompatibility is already a conceptual da... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Determinate opponent incompatibility is explained by Armstrong's partial identity account of determinate resemblance.

    If determinate incompatibility is already a conceptual datum about determinable-determinate structure, Armstrong's partial identity account is explanatorily idle rather than genuinely explanatory.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Armstrong (D.M. Armstrong)(The statement refers to his specific account of how properties relate to each other)
    An influential Australian philosopher who developed important theories about properties, universals, and how the world's structure works.
    Conceptual datum(describing what we know about how determinables and determinates work)
    A basic fact or piece of information that we can understand through thinking and reasoning, rather than just from experience.
    Explanatorily idle(in philosophy)
    Unable to actually explain or account for something; basically doing no real work in solving a problem.
    Genuinely explanatory(contrasted with being 'explanatorily idle')
    An explanation that actually helps us understand *why* something is the case, rather than just describing what is the case.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Incompatibility (in this context)(referring to logical relationships between determinates)
    When two things cannot both be true or exist at the same time—for example, something cannot be both completely red and completely blue all over.
    Partial identity account(the specific theory being evaluated in the statement)
    Armstrong's theory that determinates are partially identical to (or partially the same as) their determinable—they share some features but aren't completely the same thing.
    determinable(Ontology of properties; the debate concerns whether determinables are irreducible to their determinates)
    A higher-level property (e.g., color) that is realized or specified by more particular determinate properties (e.g., red, blue)
    determinate(Contrasted with determinables; taken to be independently posited in the causal/ontological economy)
    A maximally specific instance of a determinable property (e.g., scarlet as a determinate of red)

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Determinate opponent incompatibility is explained by Armstrong's partial identit...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective