Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If divine eros is understood as agapeic overflow rather than acquisitive want, Abrabanel's premise that desire entails lack is defeated on its own Platonic grounds.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Even self-sufficient overflow requires a recipient; giving presupposes absence in the other, reintroducing lack into the system.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Plato's eros fundamentally aims toward the Good; framing it as purposeless overflow departs from rather than defeats Abrabanel's reading.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Divine agape and Platonic eros serve different theological functions; invoking one to refute the other begs the question of their compatibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Plato's Symposium distinguishes higher love (ascending to Forms) from lower desire, supporting non-acquisitive eros models.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Divine overflow (agape) is self-sufficient and generative, logically incompatible with lack-based desire requiring external objects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Abrabanel conflates all desire with appetite; rejecting this equation dissolves his argument without abandoning Platonic frameworks.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.