If divine knowledge is not composed of discrete, temporally indexed propositions, then the move from 'some propositions change truth-value' to 'God's knowledge changes' is a non sequitur.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Divine knowledge(as the main topic being discussed): The philosophical question of how God knows things—particularly whether God knows the future, knows everything at once, or knows things the way humans do.
discrete(as used in describing sounds or events): Separate and distinct from each other, with clear breaks in between—like individual dots rather than a continuous line.
knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.): Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
non sequitur(Used to characterize Kant's alleged inference from the necessity of unity of consciousness to its sufficiency for object representation): A logical error in which a conclusion does not follow from the premises offered in its support

Based on where you are in your exploration