Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If ECT is true, God will not make evil and suffering new

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If ECT is true, God's redemptive work is complete; making suffering new would contradict finished salvation and God's perfection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A perfectly good God would not perpetuate evil into eternity; ECT's truth entails God's commitment to eliminate, not recreate, suffering.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The logic of ECT demands finality: if conscious existence continues eternally, God's justice must forbid introducing novel forms of torment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.