Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If end-setting were derivative from non-virtue sources, v... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Richard Kraut and David Wiggins have argued that phronesis and virtue jointly constitute the capacity to identify eudaimonia as the correct end, making the end-setting function non-derivative.

    If end-setting were derivative from non-virtue sources, virtue would merely execute predetermined goals, reducing its role to technical skill, not wisdom.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Richard Kraut and David Wiggins have argued that phronesis and virtue jointly co...

    Related

    Richard Kraut and David Wiggins have argued that phronesis and virtue jointly co...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective