Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If every form is a thought, then every form is a thought of a form.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Thoughts require a thinker, but forms exist independently of any mind that thinks them (Plato, Republic 507b–509b).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If forms depended on being thought, they would be contingent on minds, undermining their status as eternal, necessary entities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A form identified with a thought of itself generates an infinite regress no less vicious than the Third Man Argument it was meant to escape.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle argues in De Anima (430a3) that the intellect thinks forms without itself becoming those forms, preserving the distinction between act and object.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the form just is the thought, then the same form thought by different thinkers would be numerically distinct, collapsing the universality that forms are posited to explain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The intentional object of every thought is a form.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Every form is a thought.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.