Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If existence is not a genuine attribute, then identifying God with his existence is a category error, not a metaphysical achievement.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Even non-attributes can ground meaningful identities; 'water is H2O' is illuminating despite H2O not being a separable property of water.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
God's identity with existence could be metaphysically informative about divine simplicity, even if existence isn't a genuine attribute.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Category errors require confusion between distinct logical types; identifying God with existence need not conflate different categories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Attributes are properties that can be distinguished from their subject; existence cannot be separated from or compared to God's essence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Predication requires a meaningful distinction between subject and property; 'God exists' does not assert a property God might lack.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Category errors occur when we apply predicates incorrectly; treating existence as an attribute commits precisely this logical mistake.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.