Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If fitness-enhancing traits systematically track morally relevant properties like suffering and flourishing, evolution selects for moral accuracy, not mere survival indifference.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Evolution selects for reproductive success, not accurate representation of objective moral facts. Illusions that boost fitness are evolutionarily stable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moral intuitions track parochial tribal interests, not universal suffering. We ignore distant harms yet experience moral concern—suggesting bias, not accuracy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Many fitness-enhancing traits (deception, exploitation, infanticide) directly violate moral principles, showing evolution and morality diverge systematically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Animals that accurately detect suffering in others avoid costly conflicts and cooperate more effectively, providing direct fitness advantages.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moral intuitions about harm and wellbeing correlate strongly with evolutionarily-relevant outcomes like kin survival and reciprocal cooperation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Natural selection can favor accurate perception of morally-salient features if those features reliably indicate fitness-relevant consequences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.