Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If foundational spatiotemporal forms are non-empirical, conceptions of force and hidden causation may likewise have non-sensible origins.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Space and time may be non-empirical but still fundamentally different from causation in their necessity and universality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Inferring that one type of non-empirical concept shares origins with another requires additional justification beyond analogy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Modern physics treats force as derivative from fields and energy—empirically measurable—undermining non-sensible status.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Kant showed space and time structure experience a priori, not derived from sensation alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If spatiotemporal forms are non-empirical cognitive structures, force and causation may share this a priori origin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We cannot observe force or causation directly—only constant conjunctions—suggesting non-sensible rational origins.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.