Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If Frankfurt is correct, belief-desire causation is neither necessary nor sufficient for action, undermining the asymmetric sufficiency claim entirely.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Frankfurt's counterexamples rely on intuitions about agency that conflate action with mere bodily movement, not genuine action causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Even hierarchical accounts ultimately ground action in causal relations between mental states; they refine rather than eliminate belief-desire causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The asymmetric sufficiency claim concerns intentional action specifically, and Frankfurt addresses only marginal cases failing to undermine the core thesis.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Frankfurt's hierarchical model shows agents can act without first-order desires causing action if second-order volitions override them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Cases of addiction demonstrate action despite conflicting desires, proving belief-desire causation insufficient for explaining voluntary action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Neural pathways can trigger behavior without conscious belief-desire states, showing these mental states aren't necessary for action.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.