Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If free will were sufficient to explain natural evil, God could have created a world with free creatures but without earthquakes, viruses, or predation, since these require no free choices.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Natural laws enabling meaningful free will may necessarily produce side-effects like disease and decay that cannot be surgically removed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A world without predation, disease, or geological processes might be logically incoherent or require fundamentally different physical laws incompatible with free agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Natural suffering may serve purposes beyond free will—spiritual growth, moral development, or goods we cannot yet comprehend from our perspective.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Earthquakes, viruses, and predation involve no agent choices and cause immense suffering, so cannot be justified by free will defenses.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An omnipotent God could create physical laws permitting free choice while preventing natural disasters, since these are logically independent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If God permits natural evil despite lacking free will justification, this suggests either limited power or indifference to suffering.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.