If frequency is irrelevant to foundational status, the original critique of non-Western ethics using frequency was mischaracterized—the real disagreement concerns justification methods, not frequency.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Critique: A critique is a careful examination and judgment of something—like a book, film, artwork, or idea—where you identify both its strengths and weaknesses. When you critique something, you're not just saying whether you like it or dislike it; you're explaining *why* it works or doesn't work by analyzing specific details. It's a thoughtful, balanced way of evaluating things that helps others (and yourself) understand them better.
Foundational status(epistemology): The special position a belief has when it's meant to be a basic, self-supporting starting point that doesn't depend on other beliefs.
Justification methods(epistemology): The different ways philosophers explain WHY something is true or right—for example, proving it with logic versus proving it through experience.
Mischaracterized(philosophy generally): Described or represented in a way that's inaccurate or misleading; in this case, the original criticism got the real issue wrong.

Based on where you are in your exploration