Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If genuine knowledge of a particular requires its necessa... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Knowledge of an object is not lost when the object ceases to exist, though the nature of that knowledge shifts from predication to causal knowledge.

    If genuine knowledge of a particular requires its necessary existence as an object, then the 'shift' described is not a transformation of knowledge but its replacement by a distinct epistemic state about universals.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Necessary existence(Contrasted with contingent existence in discussion of God's mode of being)
    Existence that is not contingent; the being does not just happen to exist or not exist.
    Object (in epistemology)(knowledge requires having an object it concerns)
    The thing that knowledge is about—what your mind is directed toward or focused on when you know something.
    epistemic state(used interchangeably with 'cognitive state' in the passage)
    A cognitive state; the way things are represented or appear from the standpoint of a knowing subject
    genuine knowledge(The standard other natural philosophers at the end of the seventeenth century continued to uphold, leading them to deny that explanations of natural phenomena qualify as knowledge)
    In the Aristotelian model, knowledge that achieves certainty through intuition and demonstration, as opposed to probable or uncertain explanations

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
    particular(as used in philosophy of language and metaphysics)
    A specific individual thing (like this exact pen or that specific moment), as opposed to a general category or abstract concept.
    transformation(as used in metaphysics to describe how mind relates to matter)
    A fundamental change or evolution of one thing into another, where the new form develops out of and remains connected to its original source.
    universals(Debated in Lefèvre's Disceptatio de universali between two students of Chrysippus's academy)
    Either what particular classes of things share, or what those who reason say they share (decided by convention)

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPersonal Identity1 linked

    Related

    Knowledge of an object is not lost when the object ceases to exist, though the n...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective