Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If Gettier agents can act in light of facts via justified true belief sans knowledge, the knowledge condition is too strong for fact-relative guidance.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Gettier agents' success is accidental; they cannot reliably distinguish lucky truth from genuine fact-responsiveness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Fact-relative guidance requires stable, systematic connection to facts—exactly what knowledge provides but Gettier-JTB lacks.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
One successful Gettier action doesn't establish sufficiency; guidance demands consistent ability to act on facts, not isolated luck.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Gettier cases demonstrate justified true belief without knowledge is cognitively sufficient for rational action in the world.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If agents successfully navigate reality via JTB lacking knowledge, knowledge is not necessary for fact-relative guidance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Practical success requires only reliable cognitive connection to facts, which JTB can provide independently of knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.