Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If God atemporally knows that agent S will do A, then S cannot do otherwise, regardless of whether 'before' applies.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Atemporality means God's knowledge exists outside time, so it cannot causally constrain temporal agents' choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Logical necessity (truth-value fixity) differs from causal necessity; knowing what will happen doesn't make it unfree.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
S's ability to do otherwise can be compatible with God knowing S won't, if free will requires only absence of coercion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Atemporally knowing X means possessing infallible knowledge of X's truth value independently of temporal sequence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God's knowledge is infallible, then what God knows cannot fail to obtain without God being wrong.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An agent doing otherwise would make God's knowledge false, which contradicts infallibility, so otherwise is impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.