If God must create the best feasible world, and that world necessarily contains suffering matching HI's predictions, then HI's accuracy reflects divine necessity, not evidence against theism.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Divine necessity(as a core belief of classical theism): The idea that God must exist by definition or nature—it's impossible for God not to exist, rather than being a coincidence or choice.
Evidence against theism(the statement argues that suffering shouldn't count as such evidence): Facts or observations that would suggest God doesn't exist or that belief in God is unreasonable.
Feasible world(as used in arguments about whether God would create the best possible universe): A possible version of reality that could actually exist given the laws of logic and nature—not just any imaginary scenario, but one that's genuinely possible.
God(Classical theism; used to fix the referent of 'G' in the Bayesian formulation): An eternal, personal being of maximal power, knowledge, and goodness who created the universe

Based on where you are in your exploration