Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If God's knowledge of 'it is now raining' differs from 'it was raining yesterday,' God undergoes real epistemic change structurally identical to ordinary temporal experience.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.God's knowledge could be eternally comprehensive yet unchanging: God eternally knows the entire temporal sequence as a non-temporal manifold.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.'Epistemic change' and 'knowing different propositions at different times' equivocate; the latter doesn't require internal alteration.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Indexical propositions can be true/false relative to times without the knower's internal state changing—similar to how a timeless map represents temporal facts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Knowledge content differences require corresponding differences in the knower's epistemic state to remain truth-apt and non-vacuous.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God's knowledge has propositional structure (true/false content), that structure inherently involves temporal indexicals like 'now'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Temporal indexicals change truth-value across times; accepting this while denying epistemic change requires ad-hoc metaphysical exceptions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.