Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If 'good' means 'what we are ideally inclined to approve ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Barren Tautology Argument fails against ideal-approval theories of goodness

    If 'good' means 'what we are ideally inclined to approve of', then 'What we are ideally inclined to approve of is good' is a barren tautology

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Proponents of such definitions (e.g. Hume) do not intend these definitions to be...The Barren Tautology Argument fails against ideal-approval theories of goodnessTherefore, the tautological character of the definition does not compel the conc...

    Similar

    If a word like 'good' is to mean something, there must be some thing o...87%If a definition of 'good' is correct, a morally competent person could...87%The word 'good' is plainly meaningful86%No naturalistic definition of 'good' is correct86%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Nor is this all. The Barren Tautology Argument fails against other theories whose aim is to explicate the appeal of goodness rather than to advocate the pursuit of some alleged good thing. For instance, if “good” means “what we are ideally inclined to approve of”, then “What we are ideally inclined to approve of is good” will be a barren tautology. But since people like Hume, who propound such definitions, don’t intend them to be anything else, they are not compelled to the conclusion that such

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective