Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If grasping that health or friendship genuinely constitutes flourishing suffices to justify pursuing them, no separate moral faculty beyond reason is required.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Grasping that health flourishes does not automatically motivate pursuit; akrasia shows knowledge alone cannot compel action.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Reason identifies what IS, but moral motivation requires commitment to what OUGHT to be—a gap reason cannot bridge alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Different cultures rationally endorse conflicting values; reason needs a separate faculty to adjudicate genuinely binding obligations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Reason can identify what constitutes human flourishing through reflection on our nature and capacities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Once we rationally grasp that X genuinely contributes to flourishing, pursuing X follows necessarily without additional motivation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Positing a separate moral faculty duplicates explanatory work already performed by reason and creates unnecessary metaphysical complexity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42