Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If happiness expands to include every intrinsically desired end, the claim that happiness alone is desirable becomes vacuously true rather than substantive.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Identifying happiness with all intrinsically desired ends is not definitional inflation but rather philosophical clarification of happiness's scope.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A theory can be substantive even if its key term is broad, provided it makes meaningful claims about human nature and rational desire.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim 'only intrinsic desire grounds value' remains informative and excludes instrumental desires, even if happiness encompasses all intrinsic ones.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.A theory becomes vacuous when it redefines key terms to make itself unfalsifiable by absorbing all counterexamples.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If 'happiness' simply means 'whatever is intrinsically desired,' the theory makes no substantive claim about what we should pursue.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A meaningful ethical theory must exclude some intrinsically desired ends as not truly valuable or not ultimate goods.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.