If honesty is grounded in respect for persons rather than facts about existence, truthfulness in speech admits of justified exceptions that Rand's formulation categorically forecloses.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Ayn Rand(as a key thinker in this debate): A 20th-century philosopher who argued that people should act in their own self-interest and that selfishness can be moral; she was famous for criticizing altruism.
admits of(describing what truthfulness can permit): Allows for or makes room for the possibility of something.
categorically forecloses(describing Rand's position on whether lying is ever acceptable): Completely rules out or prevents something from being possible, with no exceptions allowed.
facts about existence(alternative foundation for honesty being contrasted): Objective truths about what is real in the world, independent of how we feel about them.
grounded in(whether distinctness or identity is explained by intrinsic features): To be explained by or to have its reason or basis in something else—like how a tree being wet is grounded in (explained by) recent rain.
justified exceptions(times when lying might be considered permissible): Cases where breaking a rule is morally acceptable because there are good reasons for doing so.
respect for persons(Kantian moral philosophy): The appropriate response owed to beings who are ends in themselves with dignity, required unconditionally of all persons.
truthfulness in speech(the main concept being discussed): The practice and principle of telling the truth in what you say.

1 topic