Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If ideas are modes of an infinite attribute (Thought), their formal reality is grounded in infinite substance, not merely the finite mind.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Finite minds demonstrably generate ideas through perception and cognition; grounding in infinite substance seems explanatorily idle.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Infinite substance cannot literally contain all particular ideas without collapsing distinctions between ideas or infinite attribute.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If ideas derive formal reality from infinite substance alone, mind's role becomes metaphysically obscure and causally inert.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Finite minds cannot generate formal reality of ideas; only infinite substance possesses the productive power to ground being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Ideas as modes of Thought attribute participate in infinite nature; their intelligibility requires infinite rather than finite source.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Grounding ideas in finite minds creates regress problem; infinite substance as single source avoids infinite chains of dependency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.