Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If invalid inference patterns occur predictably across do... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Most human errors in reasoning stem from false principles rather than from invalid inference

    If invalid inference patterns occur predictably across domains regardless of content, then structural reasoning failures are causally independent of, and irreducible to, false principles.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Causally independent of(as used in metaphysics)
    Not caused by or dependent on something else—existing or occurring on its own without being produced by that other thing.
    Invalid inference patterns(as used in logic and reasoning)
    Ways of reasoning from facts to conclusions that don't actually work—like assuming that because two things happen together, one must have caused the other.
    Structural reasoning failures(as used in logic)
    Breakdowns in how we think and make arguments, based on the basic framework or pattern of the reasoning itself rather than the specific facts involved.
    domains(the statement uses 'domains' to mean different areas where we learn things)
    Specific areas or categories of knowledge and experience—like math, sports, cooking, or recognizing animals.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    false principles(Contrasted with formal fallacies; identified as the primary source of human reasoning error)
    Foundational premises or starting assumptions that are incorrect, as distinguished from invalid logical inference from premises
    irreducible to(philosophy of science)
    Cannot be broken down into or explained solely by something else; requires its own separate explanation.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Most human errors in reasoning stem from false principles rather than from inval...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective