Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If legitimacy generates justice obligations, then international institutions (WTO, IMF) with coercive power generate global justice obligations.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
International institutions lack democratic legitimacy: affected populations cannot meaningfully participate in decision-making structures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Justice obligations require legitimacy, but legitimacy requires either consent or democratic accountability—neither exists globally in sufficient form.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even if institutions have some legitimacy, it may be insufficient to ground justice obligations; legitimacy might only justify minimal regulatory authority.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
International institutions exercise binding coercive power (sanctions, conditionality) over non-consenting states, analogous to domestic state authority.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Coercive power creates asymmetric burdens on subjects; legitimacy is the only moral basis for imposing such burdens without consent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If domestic coercive authority generates justice obligations, the same principle applies globally regardless of institutional scale or scope.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.