Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If mental properties are genuinely distinct from physical properties, they cannot be causally efficacious without violating the causal closure of the physical.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Mental properties may be constitutively identical to physical properties rather than distinct, making the premise's antecedent false.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Causal closure of the physical need not exclude mental causation if mental events are realized in physical events without being reducible to them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Emergent properties can causally influence their base physical systems; mental causation may work similarly without violating physical laws.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Physical events have sufficient physical causes; adding mental causes creates causal overdetermination absent in mature sciences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If mental properties causally influence physical events, energy must transfer between mental and physical domains, violating conservation laws.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Only entities with physical properties can causally interact in spacetime; non-physical properties lack the causal mechanism to do so.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.