Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If modes of presentation were genuine semantic contributo... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Different modes of presentation associated with co-referential names can be used to distinguish the propositions expressed by sentences containing those names.

    If modes of presentation were genuine semantic contributors, co-referential names would differ in modal profile, but 'Hesperus is Phosphorus' is necessarily true—not contingently so.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Hesperus and Phosphorus(as a historical philosophical reference)
    Two ancient names for the same celestial object (the planet Venus), used as a famous philosophical example because people didn't realize they referred to the same thing.
    Necessarily true(describing the kind of truth the statement claims sentences can have)
    True in all possible situations or worlds; impossible to be false (like 'all triangles have three sides'), unlike contingently true statements that could have been false.
    co-referential names(Philosophy of language; Frege's puzzle about identity and belief)
    Distinct names (such as 'Hesperus' and 'Phosphorus') that refer to the same object
    contingently true(Kaplan's LD logic)
    True at the world of a given context but false at some other worlds accessible from that context, so that the necessitation of the sentence is false

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    modal profile(comparing whether God and God's existence have the same logical structure)
    A description of all the different ways something could or must exist—basically, a map of what's possible and impossible for that thing.
    modes of presentation(Theories of meaning since Frege's Sense and Reference)
    The aspect of meaning of a referring term that goes beyond its referent and accounts for differences in meaning between co-referring terms
    semantic contributor(as used in philosophy of language)
    Something that affects the meaning of a statement or how we understand it. If modes of presentation were semantic contributors, it would mean the way we describe something would change what a sentence actually means.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Different modes of presentation associated with co-referential names can be used...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective