Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If moral obligations are identical with divine commands, then God cannot have moral reasons for issuing commands, making morality arbitrary (Euthyphro).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
God's nature itself (wisdom, love, justice) could provide reasons for commands without external moral standards.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Divine commands might express necessary truths about God's character, making them neither arbitrary nor grounded in external reasons.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Arbitrariness requires alternatives; if God necessarily commands what accords with divine nature, true alternatives don't exist.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If commands constitute morality itself, then moral reasons cannot precede those commands without circular reasoning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without independent moral standards, God's choices appear arbitrary—no basis exists to call them good rather than evil.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A being that grounds morality cannot simultaneously be bound by prior moral reasons, creating logical tension.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.