Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If moral principles must cohere with considered judgments about particular cases, then experiential data partially constitutes, not merely applies, the moral law.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Coherence with judgments is a justification test for principles, not evidence that experience constitutes moral law itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moral laws could exist independently and determine which experiential judgments are correct—making experience contingently applicable, not constitutive.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Confusing epistemic dependence on experience with ontological constitution of morality commits the genetic fallacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Moral principles divorced from actual human experience risk becoming vacuous abstractions incapable of guiding real conduct.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Reflective equilibrium requires bidirectional constraint: principles shape judgments and judgments reshape principles, making experience constitutive.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If considered judgments about cases can rationally override principles, those judgments contribute substantive content to moral truth itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.