Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If motivating reasons were facts (or putative facts), then we can, and sometimes do, act for a good reason.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Motivating reasons are psychological states (beliefs, desires) that causally explain action, not facts in the world (Davidson, 1963).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A reason that causally produces action must be internal to the agent, so facts qua external states cannot play the motivating role.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Normative factivism about reasons conflates the reason for which one acts with the justificatory reason that evaluates the act (Dancy, 2000).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Acting under a false belief can still constitute acting for a motivating reason, so motivating reasons cannot require the obtaining of any fact.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
To act for a good reason, one must act for a reason that is or could be a fact.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If motivating reasons were facts and putative facts, then some of the reasons for which we act would be facts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.