Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If narrow content is itself not transparently accessible ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Those who endorse content externalism should endorse only a restricted form of privileged access, limited to the narrow contents of thoughts.

    If narrow content is itself not transparently accessible to introspection, restricting privileged access to narrow content fails to preserve any epistemically significant first-person authority.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.First-person authority requires epistemic access: if I cannot introspectively know my narrow content, I lack authority over it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Narrow content (intrinsic mental states) was posited precisely to preserve privileged access against externalist arguments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If narrow content is opaque to introspection, the theory loses its primary theoretical motivation and explanatory work.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.First-person authority need not extend to all mental content; we have justified beliefs about some inaccessible cognitive processes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Narrow content can remain epistemically privileged even if not fully transparent—partial or implicit access still counts as authority.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates transparency with privileged access; subjects may have justified, defeasible knowledge of narrow content without full introspective clarity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Epistemically significant(epistemology)
    Important or meaningful in relation to knowledge—something that matters when we're thinking about what we can know and how we know it.
    First-person authority(epistemology)
    The idea that you have special expertise about your own thoughts and experiences—that your opinion about what's in your own mind should be trusted more than anyone else's.
    Introspection(Contrasted with testimony-based belief about one's mental states)
    A way of gaining information about one's own mental states from the inside, which grounds immunity to error through misidentification for mental self-ascriptions.
    Transparently accessible(philosophy of mind)
    Something that is immediately and clearly available to awareness—you can know it directly without any obstacle or confusion.
    narrow content(The restricted domain over which privileged access is held to be defensible under externalism.)
    Mental content individuated solely by factors internal to the subject, independent of the external environment.
    privileged access(Used to ground the claim that Garrison can know a priori that he thinks Donald is clueless.)
    The epistemic principle by which a thinker can know a priori the contents of their own thoughts.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    First-person authority need not extend to all mental content; we have justified ...First-person authority requires epistemic access: if I cannot introspectively kn...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    If narrow content is opaque to introspection, the theory loses its primary theor...
    Narrow content (intrinsic mental states) was posited precisely to preserve privi...
    +3 moreShow less
    Narrow content can remain epistemically privileged even if not fully transparent...The claim conflates transparency with privileged access; subjects may have justi...Those who endorse content externalism should endorse only a restricted form of p...