If natural evils serve as the indispensable environment for human moral and spiritual development, they require no separate defense beyond the teleological framework the free will defense already presupposes.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Free Will Defense(Sometimes used narrowly to cover only evil resulting from human action, but extended by some to cover evils caused by supernatural agents other than God): A version of the Greater Good Defense proposing that free creatures who can care for each other and whose welfare depends on each other's freely chosen action constitute a good that requires the possibility of persons harming each other
Indispensable(describes which mathematical objects should exist according to Quine and Putnam): So necessary and important that you cannot do without it; essential.
Natural evils(in philosophy of religion): Bad things that happen in nature and aren't caused by human choices, like diseases, earthquakes, or suffering from accidents.
Spiritual development(in philosophy of religion): The process of deepening your connection to meaning, purpose, or transcendent values (whether religious or not).

Based on where you are in your exploration