Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If natural order admits of immanent causal explanation (e... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The objection from the absence of an efficient cause does not conclusively defeat the argument from design.

    If natural order admits of immanent causal explanation (e.g., Spinoza's natura naturans), the inference from design to a transcendent planner is logically blocked before power becomes relevant.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Immanent causal explanation(as used in metaphysics)
    An explanation for why things happen that comes from causes already existing within nature itself, rather than from something outside or beyond nature.
    Logically blocked(as describing what happens to the design argument)
    When reasoning or a chain of argument is prevented from reaching a particular conclusion because the logic doesn't work that way.
    Natural order(as used in philosophy of science and metaphysics)
    The way things in nature work and behave according to regular patterns and laws, without needing anything supernatural to explain them.
    Spinoza
    Baruch Spinoza was a 17th-century Dutch philosopher who argued that God and nature are the same thing, and that everything in the universe is interconnected as one unified whole. He believed that understanding how things work through reason and logic—rather than through emotion or superstition—leads to happiness and freedom. His ideas were revolutionary for his time and continue to influence modern philosophy, theology, and how we think about the relationship between mind and body.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    design argument(Natural theology, 17th–18th century)
    An a posteriori argument that infers the existence of a divine designer from observed features of nature, such as its orderly and elegant physical laws
    natura naturans(as Spinoza's concept of how reality works)
    A Latin phrase meaning 'nature naturing'—the active, creative force of nature itself that generates and sustains everything.
    transcendent(Rickert's epistemological framework)
    To really exist without the form of being-conscious (Bewußtheit)

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology1 linked

    Related

    The objection from the absence of an efficient cause does not conclusively defea...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective