If necessary connection were merely the product of repeated experience, then a single observed causal sequence would produce no idea of necessity, yet agents form immediate causal judgments on first encounters.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Causal sequence(as used in understanding how actions happen): A chain of events where one thing causes the next thing to happen, like dominoes falling one after another.
first encounters(epistemology): The very first time you experience or observe something, before you've seen it happen repeatedly.
idea of necessity(epistemology/philosophy of mind): A mental understanding or belief that something must happen—that there's no way around it. It's the feeling that an outcome is inevitable, not just likely.
immediate causal judgments(epistemology/philosophy of mind): Quick, automatic conclusions about cause-and-effect that happen instantly in your mind, without needing to think about it carefully. Like immediately knowing that a ball falling is caused by gravity.
necessary connection(Hume's account of the origin of the concept of causation, Treatise I.III.14): The felt sense of the mind being pulled from one impression to an associated idea, which the mind then projects onto external objects as if it were a connection among the objects themselves
repeated experience(epistemology): Seeing the same thing happen over and over again. For example, watching water boil every time you heat it to 100°C gives you repeated experience of that pattern.

2 topics