Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If neither party admits the imposed rule, then the rule h... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Applying a single rule of judgement to both parties in a differend wrongs both parties when neither side admits that rule

    If neither party admits the imposed rule, then the rule has no legitimate standing for either party

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice & Punishment
    2 linked

    Related

    A differend lacks any rule of judgement applicable to both parties' argumentsApplying a single rule of judgement to both parties in a differend wrongs both p...Imposing a rule that has no legitimate standing for a party wrongs that party

    Similar

    Imposing a rule that has no legitimate standing for a party wrongs tha...85%The party who performs first has no assurance the other will perform, ...73%Self-rule takes precedence over any political obligation regardless of...73%The rules of recognition only define what the law is; they cannot sett...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: lyotard
    View source passageHide passage
    As distinguished from a litigation, a differend would be a case of conflict, between (at least) two parties, that cannot be resolved for lack of a rule of judgement applicable to both of the arguments. One side’s legitimacy does not imply the other’s lack of legitimacy. However, applying a single rule of judgement to both in order to settle their differend as though it were merely a litigation would wrong (at least) one of them (and both of them if neither side admits this rule). (Differend, xi)

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective