If no separately existing entity constitutes the person, then the concept of 'survival' after total physical discontinuity is logically empty rather than merely empirically uncertain.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Survival(as used in philosophy of mind and metaphysics): In this context, the idea that some essential part of you (your consciousness or identity) continues to exist after your physical body dies.
empirically uncertain(as used in epistemology): Something we can't prove or disprove through observation and experience, but that still makes logical sense as an idea—like wondering if aliens exist.
logically empty(as used in epistemology and logic): A concept that doesn't actually mean anything or make sense when you think it through carefully—not just impossible to prove, but literally nonsensical.
person(Used to ground the claim that bodily and mental authority belongs to the person whose body and mind they are): An entity constituted by a body and a mind, which are parts or aspects of that entity

Based on where you are in your exploration