Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If normativity is internal to practices, no practice-transcendent 'universal' norms can be indispensable in the way P1 requires.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Some norms (e.g., truth-telling, reciprocity) appear across diverse practices, suggesting practice-transcendent universal grounding.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Practices themselves rely on meta-norms (logic, consistency) that operate across all practices, not internal to any one.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Claiming normativity is internal to practices requires criteria for distinguishing legitimate from illegitimate practices—a transcendent standard.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Normativity emerges from shared understandings within practices; external universal norms would contradict this internal genesis.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Practices historically show normativity varying by context; this variability undermines claims of universal necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If universal norms were indispensable, they would transcend practices rather than being constituted by them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42