Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If NP ≠ coNP, then problems in NP ∩ coNP are not NP-compl... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If FACTORIZATION is not in P and NP ≠ coNP, then there exist natural mathematical problems that are not feasibly decidable but also not NP-complete.

    If NP ≠ coNP, then problems in NP ∩ coNP are not NP-complete.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    FACTORIZATION is in NP ∩ coNP.If FACTORIZATION is not in P and NP ≠ coNP, then there exist natural mathematica...If FACTORIZATION is not in P, it is not feasibly decidable.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If NP ≠ coNP, then NP-complete problems cannot be in coNP, so they can...96%A positive answer to Open Question 2 implies that problems in NP ∩ coN...92%Problems in NP ∩ coNP are unlikely to be NP-complete.91%Problems in NP ∩ coNP are unlikely to be NP-complete (or coNP-complete...90%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    [21] It also follows from the transitivity of \(\leq_P\) that the existence of a polynomial time algorithm for even one \(\textbf{NP}\)-complete problem would entail the existence of polynomial time algorithms for all problems in \(\textbf{NP}\). The existence of such an algorithm would thus run strongly counter to expectation in virtue of the extensive effort which has been devoted to finding efficient solutions for particular \(\textbf{NP}\)-complete problems such as \(\sc{INTEGER}\ \sc{PROGRA

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective