Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If omnipotence has no logical exceptions, the fixity of the past is a contingent fact, not a necessary one.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Changing the past creates logical contradiction: the past cannot simultaneously have and not have occurred in the same respect.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Omnipotence plausibly means maximal power within logical constraints, not power to violate logic itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The fixity of the past grounds our causal understanding; without it, causation itself becomes incoherent, not just inconvenient.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical impossibilities (like square circles) don't limit omnipotence; they're not genuine possibilities to actualize.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the past's fixity were metaphysically necessary, an omnipotent being would face a genuine constraint on power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A being with unrestricted power should be able to retroactively alter facts unless doing so involves logical contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42