Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If one activity is correctly valued more than another, it must be because the first produces more numerous, intense, or durable pleasures.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Mill himself distinguishes 'higher' from 'lower' pleasures based on qualitative differences recognized by competent judges, not quantitative aggregation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If qualitative superiority is irreducible to quantity, then correct valuation can track quality of pleasure independent of numerousness, intensity, or duration.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
G.E. Moore's ideal utilitarianism holds that beauty, knowledge, and friendship have intrinsic value independent of the pleasure they produce.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If non-hedonic goods can be correctly valued more than pleasure-producing alternatives, then quantity of pleasure cannot be the sole basis for comparative valuation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Activities have no intrinsic comparative worth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The only basis for preferring one activity over another under hedonism is the quantity of pleasure produced.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.