Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If ontological commitment tracks entailment without privi... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Quantifiers and variables have no privileged role in determining the ontological commitments of a theory.

    If ontological commitment tracks entailment without privileging quantificational structure, there is no principled basis for distinguishing genuine commitment from rhetorical or instrumental assertion of existence claims.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Existence claims(metaphysics and philosophy of language)
    Statements that say something is real or exists, like 'The Eiffel Tower exists' or 'God exists.'
    Genuine commitment(metaphysics and philosophy of language)
    A real, serious claim that something exists or is true, as opposed to just talking about it casually or for a particular purpose.
    Instrumental assertion(philosophy of language and epistemology)
    A statement made as a tool to accomplish some practical goal, not necessarily because you believe it—like a lawyer saying 'My client is innocent' in court as part of their job.
    Quantificational structure(in logic and linguistics)
    The part of a sentence that specifies how many things you're talking about—like whether you mean 'all boys' or 'some boys' or 'one specific boy.'

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Rhetorical assertion(philosophy of language)
    A statement made primarily for effect or persuasion, rather than because you actually believe it's true—like when someone says 'There are a million reasons why you're wrong' without meaning exactly one million.
    entailment(Conceptualist framework)
    Understood in terms of truth at a world
    ontological commitment(Used to derive that literal truth of 'a is F' entails existence of a)
    The criterion by which acceptance of a sentence as literally true commits one to the existence of the objects referred to by singular terms in that sentence, provided the sentence cannot be paraphrased away.
    principled basis(as used in ethics and reasoning)
    A solid foundation or reason for doing something that is based on clear, consistent rules or values rather than on whim or favoritism.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Quantifiers and variables have no privileged role in determining the ontological...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective