Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If P is false, asserting P is useful for maintaining trut... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→No opinion should be suppressed, because asserting any opinion is useful for discovering and maintaining truth.

    If P is false, asserting P is useful for maintaining truth by contrast.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty2 linked

    Related

    Any opinion P that is a candidate for suppression must be either true, false, or...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If P is partially true, asserting P is useful for refining and maintaining truth...
    If P is true, asserting P is useful for discovering truth.
    No opinion should be suppressed, because asserting any opinion is useful for dis...
    +1 moreShow less
    Whatever is useful for discovering and maintaining truth should be welcome, not ...

    Similar

    If P is true, asserting P is useful for discovering truth.94%If P is partially true, asserting P is useful for refining and maintai...91%Knowledge implies truth.86%Uniqueness is false.86%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill
    View source passageHide passage
    Mill’s argument for the freedom of thought and discussion is given in chapter 2 of On Liberty, and in it he aims to show that there should be no attempt “to control the expression of opinion” (Liberty, XVIII: 229; see Riley 2015: 74ff.). The chapter takes the form of a proof from the exhaustion of cases. Mill claims that, for any opinion P which is a candidate for suppression, P must be either: (i) true, (ii) false, or (iii) partially true. Whichever is the case, he argues, P’s assertion will be

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective